FEW countries are obsessed with football like Scotland; few countries are as indifferent about football as the USA. Yet, according to FIFA, Scotland are ranked 62nd in the world while the USA are seventh. This Saturday we'll have a better idea of the gap between the two sides' abilities when Scotland play the US at Hampden, and, if one Scottish footballing legend is to be believed, his native land could be on the verge of a humbling experience.
Charlie Cooke was an old-school winger with Dundee, Aberdeen and Chelsea, remembered with misty-eyed fondness by those lucky enough to watch him play in the 1960s and 1970s. He was long-haired, good-looking and taunted lumpen full-backs like a matador - in short, the nearest Scotland ever got to a George Best. But while we wake each morning expecting to read Best's obituary in the paper, Cooke's whereabouts are a mystery to most.
He saw out his career in the short-lived glamour of the North American Soccer League, a venture that also helped boost the pension funds of Pele, Beckenbauer and Best himself. After the NASL collapsed, Cooke stayed on across the pond, enamoured by the USA's can-do mentality and lack of any need for a word like dreich. Now he is one of the most respected coaches of youth soccer - as they still insist on calling it - in the country.
When I spoke to a him a couple of years ago, he had news for those who patronised his adopted country's ability with a football. People don't realise how big the sport is here, he told me. Soccer is the biggest participation sport in the country among children, and, Cooke insisted, that pointed to an inevitable conclusion: the USA would be world champions within 20 years. And this of a country who, when it was awarded the 1994 World Cup, ranked tractor-pulling ahead of association rules football among its favourite sports. But by 2002 the USA had reached the quarter-finals of the World Cup. Cooke told me that he hadn't seen Scotland play in a while, but that they'd struggle against the USA. Now, on Saturday, I'll get a chance to see if the Americans really have progressed as much as Scotland have regressed.
I'm not convinced by Cooke's argument, and rest my case on my experiences as a counsellor in a summer camp in North Carolina in 2000. Eager to make some converts to the real football - "Because the foot kicks the ball," I said with sniffy pedantry - I organised a USA vs Rest of the World challenge soccer match. The Rest of the World consisted largely of talented Venezuelans sent north for the summer to improve their English. By contrast, the US had a paucity of talent. One eager volunteer informed me he was the best goddam defender in his state, which, when I gave him a trial, turned out to mean only that he could toe-punt the ball a phenomenal distance in whichever direction he was facing (but only if it was stationary).
My only hope for evening up the sides was Phillip, a gifted all-rounder who was at least as talented - and bigger - than any of the Venezuelans. But on the day of the match, Phillip was nowhere to be found. As kick-off approached I was still searching the vast camp's many cabins, until one of Phillip's friends strolled up to tell me my star player would not be playing. The reason? Because he was 'kinda embarrassed' to play soccer.
Football is a sport most played largely by younger children and women in the US, but it was only Phillip's reluctance to show up that made me realise realise how deeply unfashionable it remained. He was happy to wow the opposite sex with his skills on a basketball court, but, to Phillip, admitting a flair for soccer was the social equivalent of asking a girl out by breathing garlic in her face and asking whether she'd like to learn Klingon.
I admit to a bit of concern about the prospect of Scotland suffering a humbling on Saturday. But if football had even the slightest hint of street-cred across the pond, I'd have been absolutely terrified.